Upper caste reservation: Constitution does not provide for it, says Retired SC Justice Chelameswar

0 Comments

Upper caste reservation: Retired Supreme Court Justice Jasti Chelameswar has said that the Constitution doesnt have a provision that enables the MPs to enact a law to grant reservation to economically weaker sections (EWS). According to a report in The Indian Express, Justice Chelameswar, who retired as the second most senior Judge of the Supreme Court on June 22 last year, said that it is to be seen upto what extent the current programme will sustain in court if challenged. Justice Chelameswar said that the To what extent the current programme will be sustained in court, I do not know and it is to be seen. I can only say that the text of the Constitution does not provide for it, Earlier this month, the Parliament passed the 124th Constitution (124th Amendment) Bill to add new clauses in Article 15 and 16 to grant 10% reservation to EWS in the general category. Meanwhile, a petition has been filed in the top court challenging the Bill to amend the Constitution. The bill has already received presidential assent. Justice Chelameswar was among the four judges who had in January last year held an unprecedented press conference questioning then CJI Dipak Misras style of functioning. The remaining three justices were Ranjan Gogoi (now CJI), Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph. When Justice Chelameswar was asked about the post-retirement government posts to judges, he said, The difficulty is that lots of laws stipulate the requirement of retired judges or sitting judges. You cannot then say no judge can be appointed. The remark also comes in the backdrop of a controversy over Justice AK Sikri getting a government offer last year for the post-retirement assignment.

标签:, , , ,

分类目录

文章归档

标签